Power line route doesn’t meet our ‘siting criteria’
by Editorial
Oct 13, 2009 | 811 views | 3 3 comments | 18 18 recommendations | email to a friend | print
It’s a textbook example of corporate obfuscation: First, tell people you’re going to build power lines through their valley in order to provide for their future electricity needs. Next, propose several different routes as part of an elaborate shell game to keep public opposition from building against any one route. Then develop arbitrary “siting criteria” any route must conform to — criteria that, when applied, only fit the routes you’ve already proposed. Finally, solicit gallons of input from the public, accepting any suggestions in line with what you want to do.

Rocky Mountain Power has gone through all these machinations and more in planning its Mona to Oquirrh transmission line, which will run through Tooele Valley. The company can point to several meetings, Web sites, public documents and newspaper articles as evidence they have conducted an exhaustive public outreach program to inform residents about the project. But the noise of all that “communication” is really the sound of a community being railroaded.

RMP has talked a lot but it hasn’t listened or reacted to residents concerns in any significant way. In fact, several government leaders have said the company has basically ignored their painstaking efforts to devise an alternative route that would avoid building transmission towers along Tooele’s undeveloped southeast benches.

Tooele City Mayor Patrick Dunlavy said of the company, “It became apparent at the last couple of meetings that their deadlines were coming up and that they had basically, in my opinion, not really negotiated in good faith.” Tooele County Commissioner Jerry Hurst seconded that opinion, saying, “I don’t know what kind of game we’re playing here, but I don’t like it.”

Comments like those make us very cynical about RMP’s public outreach campaign. It appears this company came to the Tooele Valley with a specific plan in mind, and no amount of local opposition was ever going to be enough to dissuade them.

Well, sorry, Rocky Mountain Power, but your Tooele benches route simply doesn’t meet our siting criteria. Our hillsides mean too much to us. In fact, city officials have fought hard this decade to keep our hillsides open so that we don’t repeat the overdevelopment mistakes that have blighted large areas of the Wasatch Front. We aren’t about to sacrifice one of the most beautiful and defining characteristics of this valley without a fight.

And this fight isn’t over yet.
comments (3)
« BKiser wrote on Wednesday, Nov 04 at 07:46 PM »
Marfall-

You obviously don't understand responsible journalism to critique an editorial as journalism. And editorial is an opinion. It is not journalism. This is not a news story, but an opinion. Therefore you see it in the editorial column and not the front page where hard news belongs.
« marfall wrote on Thursday, Oct 15 at 11:52 PM »
Just curious to know the author of this piece of irresponsible journalism. I have attended some of the public meetings and what I witnessed is an attitude of not in my back yard by a group of citizens on the southeast bench who would prefer the that power lines be in Grantsville, Lake Point or anywhere but near "their" bench. I must say they have done an affective job of getting support from the city and county's elected officials who should be protecting the interests of all citizens. I have heard that these citizens have recommended that RMP run the larger 500kv lines, not the 345kv lines proposed by the power company, along the bench of the Stansbury and build a substation north near the lake to plan for other utilites to connect at some far off future date. I have also heard that some of these lines need to get over the mountains to a location in West Jordan and this could possibly mean that these lines would go through established residential neighborhoods in Lake Point, Stansbury Park and Erda. Would't this have a greater impact on a larger number of citizens?? And wouldn't this plan also cost more money? Who do you think pays for the extra cost? We all do. No wonder RMP said it did not meet "siting criteria". Shame on you Tooele citizens, trying to push what you don't want on to others. And shame on you Mayor Dunlavy. And the rest of you in Tooele County get the facts and let your voices be heard or it will be those you elect that railroad you and not the power company.
report abuse...

Comments will be posted after review. Please allow up to 24 hours for comment approval.

Readers are solely responsible for the content of the comments they post here. Comments do not necessarily reflect the opinion or approval of the Tooele Transcript-Bulletin. Abusive comments and users are subject to rejection or removal without notification.

We will reject and remove comments that contain any of the following: Potentially libelous statements; personal attacks, insults or threats; profanity or obscene references; copyrighted articles or information used without permission; promotional messages of a commercial nature; links to other Web sites; comments unrelated to the topic of the article.

By posting a comment, you are agreeing to abide by these guidelines. Violation of these guidelines may result in a user being barred from posting on the Web site.